WE ALSO BELIEVE THAT THE PRESIDENT, AS CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OF THE US, HAS THE SAME RIGHT AND AUTHORITY TO EXAMINE THE INTEGRITY AND FINANCIAL HOLDINGS OF CERTAIN WEALTHY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND ESTABLISH THE TRUE IDENTITY OF A FOREIGN NATIONAL WITH NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE!
On April 3,2019 The World Tribune reported allegations, in a column by Tribune Staff writers, that as Vice President, Joe Biden used his Color of Official Right to extort millions of dollars from foreign governments. They wrote, “ Peter Schweizer, Government Accountability Institute president and author of bestselling book “Clinton Cash”, details in his new book, “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends”, the China scandal involving Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.”
Mr Schweizer went on to say, “The way they get around the law is they don’t give the money to the politician, they don’t even give it to their spouse – they give it to their kids or they give it to a sibling. And that’s a way that it avoids detection. The amounts of money are massive.”
“Schweizer then got into some specifics related to Biden and his son Hunter: “For example, there are three major deals involving the Chinese government and family members, close aides of the Secretary of State John Kerry and the Vice President Joe Biden. …
“In December of 2013, Hunter Biden flies on Air Force 2 to Beijing, China, with his father. His father meets with Chinese officials, he’s very soft on Beijing. The most important thing that happens, happens 10 days after they return. And that’s when Hunter Biden’s small, private equity firm called Rosemont Seneca Partners gets a $1 billion private equity deal with the Chinese government, not with the Chinese corporation, with the government. And what people need to realize is Hunter Biden has no background in China, he has no background in private equity, the deal he got in the Shanghai free-trade zone, nobody else had. Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Blackstone, nobody had this deal.”
He continued, “It’s very, very clear and that’s the first of a series of deals that Hunter Biden strikes with the Chinese government, so there’s no question, when you chart what Joe Biden is doing with China, the meetings he’s having, and the deals that his “son” is procuring at the same time, that they are buying off Biden through his son. I think it’s crystal clear.”
Again quoting from the excellent article by the World Tribune, “Biden’s role in the firing of Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin in 2016 could prove to be a major issue for the former vice president.
You couldn’t ask for a better confession than what follows, again from the Tribune, “Last year, during a Council on Foreign Relations event, Biden told the audience that he pressed President Petro Poroshenko to fire Shokin, including threatening to withdraw a $1 billion U.S. loan from Ukraine, which had been economically decimated due to its war with Russian forces since 2014.”
“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’ ” Biden said he told Poroshenko.
“Well, son of a b—-, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden added.
Shokin had been working on a corruption probe that implicated the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings, a company that employed Hunter Biden, as a board member, The Hill reported.
Shokin told The Hill that he had made “specific plans” for the probe, including “interrogations and other crime-investigation procedures into all members of the executive board, including Hunter Biden.”
The investigation ended shortly after Shokin was fired, and no charges were filed against any individuals of the company.
From the DOJ Manuel…Title 18 Section 1951 USC states, (a)
Whoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce, by robbery or extortion or attempts or conspires so to do, or commits or threatens physical violence to any person or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
In addition to the “wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear,” the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951) defines extortion in terms of “the obtaining of property from another, with his consent . . . under color of official right.” In fact, the under color of official right aspect of the Hobbs Act derives from the common law meaning of extortion. As the Supreme Court explained in a recent opinion regarding the Hobbs Act,”[a]t common law, extortion was an offense committed by a public official who took ‘by color of his office’ money that was not due to him for the performance of his official duties. . . . Extortion by the public official was the rough equivalent of what we would now describe as ‘taking a bribe.'” Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255 (1992) Title 18 Section 2404 USC Hobbs Act Under Color of Official Right; In addition to the “wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear,” the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951) defines extortion in terms of “the obtaining of property from another, with his consent . . . under color of official right.” In fact, the under color of official right aspect of the Hobbs Act derives from the common law meaning of extortion. As the Supreme Court explained in a recent opinion regarding the Hobbs Act,
In order to show a violation of the Hobbs Act under this provision, the Supreme Court recently held that “the Government need only show that a public official has obtained a payment to which he was not entitled, knowing that the payment was made in return for official acts.” While the definition of extortion under the Hobbs Act with regard to force, violence or fear requires the obtaining of property from another with his consent induced by these means, the under color of official right provision does not require that the public official take steps to induce the extortionate payment: It can be said that “the coercive element is provided by the public office itself.” Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255 (1992);
Regarding the financial holdings of certain rich members of Congress AN IRS FULL CASH FLOW AUDIT MUST BE CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE HOW WEALTHY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS CAME TO BE SO WEALTHY AS TO AFFORD NUMEROUS HOUSES, MILLION DOLLAR ESTATES, WINERY’S AND OTHER HOLDINGS… AND IF THE SAME TYPE OF INFLUENCE THAT WAS USED BY THEM AS WAS USED BY THE FORMER VICE PRESIDENT OF THE US.
THE FOLLOWING WEALTHY, MEMBERS’ FINANCIAL RECORDS MUST BE AUDITED; SPEAKER Nancy Pelosi, REP Maxine Waters, Jerry Nadler, Adam Shiff, Eric Swalwel, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
We believe that a full INS investigation must also be conducted to fully establish the citizenship, birth place and identity of the person who claims to be Ilhan Omar, Rep from Minnesota. Omar does not have a birth certificate to prove identity and refused to answer INS questions about her brother and husband. Some allege she committed Fraud to become a US citizen. The American people demand to know who she is without assumptions! She must prove who she is to the satisfaction of we the people…we don’t have to prove who she is not! To claim ALL her records were destroyed by the disarray and turmoil in her former Country is not satisfactory.