Cover Story |
Just Looking For a Homeby Buck Quigley |
|
|
A new campus for UB could displace hundreds of Buffalonians
Get Lorraine Chambley and Rodena Perry together, and you’re bound to hear the relaxed sort of conversation that’s typical between old friends. “The way we are now, we’re a family,” Chambley explains. “I live a door and a space from her.”
We’re in Perry’s living room, which shows off her obvious flair for decorating. Chambley’s sister and niece also live in the same apartment building, and it’s a nice arrangement because Chambley’s sister doesn’t have a car. “If either one of them need me, I can just do what they need, right here. But if they really needed me, and they were seventeen blocks away, I’d have to get myself together to get to them. And it’s unfair. We’re all right here together, and they’re not trying to find an area where they can put us back like this,” she says.
Perry, Chambley, and Chambley’s sister and niece are all residents of McCarley Gardens, the HUD-subsidized, low-income housing development that sits on 15 acres of land bordered by Goodell, Michigan, Virginia, and Oak streets in Buffalo, two blocks east of Main. The place was the vision of the late Reverend Burnie C. McCarley, and the late Reverend Bennett Smith, of St. John’s Baptist Church, located at 184 Goodell Street. Built in 1978, the apartments today house some 150 families comprised of single-parent and low-income households, senior citizens and physically challenged individuals. For some residents, it has been home for 30 years.
McCarley Gardens doesn’t fit the negative stereotype of low-income housing. And pity the individual who would use the term “projects” to describe the complex within earshot of any of the residents. Walking around the well-maintained grounds, you won’t see any graffiti or litter. One exception is the occasional cigarette butt that gets carelessly tossed there by someone walking away from the Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus—where smoking is prohibited even on the sidewalks. But even those little intrusions are becoming less frequent, thanks to the vigilance of residents unafraid to scold interlopers who don’t respect the grounds.
However, the pride the residents take in this place they call home may not be enough to stop a more aggressive intrusion by the BNMC, if things move ahead according to plans sketched out by the University at Buffalo and current St. John’s Reverend Michael Chapman. McCarley Gardens became a reality at a time in the 1970s when the land it occupies was valued at next to nothing. UB was accelerating development of its Amherst Campus, while students at the South Campus were often attending classes in “temporary” Quonset huts.
Now, according to Chapman, the University is offering his St. John the Baptist Church Fruit Belt Community Development Corporation a figure in the neighborhood of $15 million for the land in order to build a new campus there. It is hoped that creative “synergy” will be the result of relocating all of UB’s medical, nursing, and dental students from the South Campus to the BNMC—five miles down Main Street—near Buffalo General Hospital, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, and other medical businesses. The bolder hope is that the resulting increase in activity will resurrect a section of the city that has suffered disproportionately over the past 60 years.
A bit of history
Henry Louis Taylor Jr. is the Director of the Center for Urban Studies at UB. In “A Historical Overview of Blacks in the Fruit Belt,” he outlines the history of the place. Beginning in the 1950s, the population composition of this traditionally German neighborhood began to shift, as more and more whites fled to the suburbs—hastened by news that the Kensington Expressway would soon be cutting a swath through the East Side.
In addition, Taylor writes, “during the 1950s, a massive urban renewal project on the lower East Side destroyed about 30 city blocks and decimated the historic center of Black Buffalo. Many of those displaced African Americans, along with black newcomers to the City, settled in the Fruit Belt. Between 1940 and 1970 more than 70,000 African Americans poured into Buffalo, as the number of blacks living in the City soared from about 18,000 to 94,000, an increase of 422%.”
Then, in the 1960s, the Fruit Belt went through an aggressive component of Urban Renewal that focused on improved housing to regenerate the area. Demolitions began in earnest, destroying countless old Victorians to make way for new builds. Compounding this questionable strategy was the fact that many more houses were destroyed than were ever rebuilt, resulting in vacant lots.
Taylor points out the tragically different approaches that were employed in the Fruit Belt and neighboring Allentown, beginning in 1970. “In Allentown, they did not use massive demolition. Instead, they provided developers and upwardly mobile residents with low-rate loans to encourage the rehabilitation of the existing structures; while in the Fruit Belt, the city bulldozer destroyed homes and made no effort to maintain the neighborhood’s historic character...between 1970 and 1990, the value of housing in the Fruit Belt increased by 140%, while in Allentown it increased by 409%.”
The path ahead
Looking back at the past, it’s impossible to ignore all the mistakes that were made. Now one of the stated aims of building up the medical corridor is to reverse these mistakes. Thousands of employees and students would be injected into the area.
According to UB Architecture Professor Robert Shibley, one of the goals is to avoid “concentrating pockets of poverty, but rather finding ways that we create the mixed environment. Mixed income, mixed race, mixed class, in a way that gives us a much more equitable and supportable social ecology. The question I come back to is, in twenty years, what do we want our city to look like?”
New shops and living spaces would be created, but the tricky part is the fact that the neighborhood is not a blank slate for designers. Residents, like those in McCarley Gardens, have built contented lives there. But because they are renters, and not homeowners, they fear their voices have not been included in the planning process. And there is plenty of reason for them to feel that way.
Discussions between Reverend Chapman and UB have been taking place over the past three years, but according to McCarley residents, they first got wind of things this past February. At a recent meeting, many questions were raised about the state of negotiations, and what the impending sale of the property would mean to them. Where would they go, and what would happen to the relationships they’ve established with friends in their apartment community?
Chapman offered assurances that new, better homes would be built for them in the Fruit Belt. What he didn’t offer was a glance at the “St. John McCarley Gardens Relocation Proposal Site Map,” created by Foit-Albert Associates back in February. The map illustrates proposed relocation sites where forty-three townhouses designed for two, three, and four family units would be constructed to offer housing for the displaced residents.
The map confirms Lorraine Chambley’s fears that they will be scattered over 22 blocks. Some will be on Best Street, between Michigan and Masten, while others will be moved across the Kensington Expressway on Cherry Street near Mortimer. Still others would land on Earl Place, across from the Makowski Early Childhood Center.
Other options
Shibley stresses that the acquisition of McCarley Gardens is not essential to implementing UB’s plan. There are other ways to create the kind of square footage needed to move university departments to the BNMC. Another option on the table calls for obtaining Pilgrim Village, another set of HUD-subsidized apartments situated on the block bordered by Ellicott, Best, Michigan, and North Streets. Pilgrim Village is owned by Mark Trammell, and he says that UB representatives have contacted him regarding the property. He also said he supports them, and medical research in general, but he said UB has not made an offer. He says they showed him drawings, but that discussions were “exploratory.” There have been no conversations with the residents at Pilgrim Village.
Before anything can happen, HUD will need to approve such sales, having pushed many millions of dollars into the properties over the years. They would also need to approve any relocation proposals for residents.
There may also be higher levels of approval, if you listen to Rodena Perry. “We’re not giving up. It’s not too late. And it’s not up to Reverend Chapman. It’s up to the Man Up Above. We’re the middleman. God’s gonna tell us what’s going on.” She reflects and says, “If they do take it from us, we put up a good fight, and we tried. We just wanted somebody to listen to us. To hear our side of the story.”
Reader Comments
Uncabobbo 12 Nov 2009, 11:35
Your article portrays this apartment as well maintained and without a lot of problems. Just seems to me that this is the sort of place Buffalo would wish to keep. I'm thinking there are alot of places in that area that could be rehabbed for use by the University. Even places that seem to scream out for demolition. Good luck and best wishes Rodena & Lorraine.
Buffalo-Blues 12 Nov 2009, 14:52
This is one of the better stories I've seen in Artvoice. Shibley says, "in twenty years, what do we want our city to look like"? The question should also be, how do we want to get there and at what cost? Buffalo got where it is today with back room deals and a heartless urban renewal approach that pushed the poor, brown, and weak to the side at the expense of "progress". Now, we need to stop this from happening again. If UB can't grow without squashing poor people, then maybe it should not grow. After all, UB is a public univerisity. Our tired, poor and huddled masses should have a say in how the big university develops. What good is an university that grows with blood on its hands? UB needs to step up to the plate and build a univerisity that cares about those who have been left behind. That is the mission of a true public university.
sbrof 12 Nov 2009, 16:43
There is plenty of room for better, nicer and newer housing for the McCarley garden residents. While well maintained and relatively trouble free the gardens are a barrier for Fruit Belt residents to services that the Medical Campus, Allentown and Downtown could provide. Instead of a stabilizing force they have isolated and cut the growing BNMC from Downtown. The Pastor is already building very nice and beautiful homes around the Fruit Belt. The removal of these stable and family oriented families from the Fruit Belt is probably a cause of its continued malaise. If you want the Fruit Belt to stabilize it needs stable families in it. Not isolated outside and from it. This land would allow for growth of not just UB, but other businesses and regionally important institutions.
BfloMike 13 Nov 2009, 17:16
In general this is a well balanced article. However it does raise some questions: Since the Gardens were built in 1978 after 30 years have they outlived their usefulness? Does it cost more to maintain them than the church is able to recoup from subsidized rents? While nice and clean the Garden's represent failed urban planning experiments of the 60's and 70's that isolate communities rather they incorporate them into the fabric of a community. We bemoan the "gated" community on our waterfront and yet we want to protect a "gated" community in the heart of the region's greatest chance for revival; the BNMC. This is something that needs to be done, but done in a way that is respectful and fair to the current residents.
Moss 15 Nov 2009, 13:46
An individual should have a pretty darned, clearly defined reason, for requiring their community to help pay their rent for decades at a time. I think these "victims" might receive more compassion from the readers if their mental or physical limitations were explained. We are all compassionate towards the truly needy, and because of that concern, we are feeling less and less charitable toward individuals who may be depleting funding available for, and being denied to, the truly needy.
maggie 16 Nov 2009, 16:54
This is their home. Plain and simple. I am always amazed how cavalier people can be when it is someone else's home that is threatened .. My prayers and thoughts are with them . thank you artvoice for bringing attention to this matter.
HistoryLesson 18 Nov 2009, 10:53
In New Haven, CT they bulldozed a neighborhood in order to make way for Pfizer to expand their operations and build a retail mall. It went to the Supreme court and resulted in the Kelo decision. The Court said, "sure, go ahead and kick the residents out, Pfizer is going to do great things." Now, Pfizer is leaving New Haven, the neighborhood is bulldozed, and there is vacant land where a neighborhood use to be. So, where is the Beef when it comes to UB. I'd like to see the balance sheet for the campus development plan before they kick out all of these residents to make way for progress. Last I checked, UB didn't have a dime raised to build this new campus, the 3rd in it's portfolio. Will UB build a new campus on a dream and a prayer or is there real money in place? Also, look at the other two campuses. Is the medical campus going to be neglected like the crime infested south campus, or will it be a cluster of building surrounded by a sea of vacant land that never was developed like the north campus. Fool Buffalo once, shape on UB; fool Buffalo twice shame on Buffalo.
Joanna 18 Nov 2009, 11:22
This is nuts. There are two types of housing downtown- condos, and subsidized housing. There are tons of abandoned factories that could be turned into lofts, or even rebuilt into traditional dorms. College students love that stuff. I don't understand how it's always the most disadvantaged people that pay the highest price for "economic development" that will "help" them.... by excluding them from their former communities? What's worse is that this isn't the only hitch in the UB2020 plan that is going to negatively affect the poorest in our city.
ronnie alexander
16 Jul 2010, 15:24
power to the people. these residents who have lived there for about 30 years should have a say in how they live . a real working class community with old school values and deep love and passion for their home let them live for many years there if they want to .all people of color working class poor disabled gay and lesbian unite peace baby!
Leave a Comment:
|
|
Issue Navigation> Issue Index > v8n46 (week of Thursday, November 12) > Just Looking For a Home This Week's Issue • Artvoice Daily • Artvoice TV • Events Calendar • Classifieds |







