News |
No, Pioneers!by Ellen Przepasniak |
|
|
Brown administration says no to locally grown vegetables, grassroots development on a string of vacant, city-owned properties on the East Side.
Drive down Fillmore Street between Sycamore and Broadway and you’ll see boarded-up buildings, dilapidated homes, and ubiquitous empty lots. By anyone’s estimation, it’s a rough neighborhood. But walk into 812 Fillmore, and you’ll find dozens of shoes neatly paired in the entranceway, and a warm, welcoming living room filled with children doing their homework, cooking and playing. This is the home of Mark and Janice Stevens, a couple who moved from a farm in Wyoming County to the East Side of Buffalo last year.
It’s not common around here to hear of a family moving from the country into the city; for decades our population has flowed in the other direction. But the Stevenses are trying to make their new home a little bit more like their old one. Last year, they put in a bid to the city to purchase nearly two acres of adjoining lots on Wilson Street, which runs parallel to Fillmore, behind their home. They wanted to develop the land into an urban farm where they would grow fresh fruits and vegetables for their family and surrounding community. Their bid was denied. They were told by the City of Buffalo’s Department of Real Estate that Habitat for Humanity had plans to develop homes on the land.
It was then that David Franczyk—president of the Common Council, Fillmore councilmember, and resident of the same neighborhood—took up the Stevens’ cause. “That’s all fine and well, but a plan should not be a straightjacket,” Franczyk says of Habitat’s intentions to build there. “There are 14,000 lots in the city with another 10,000 houses coming down. We’re not going to build on all of them.”
Franczyk set up a meeting between Stevens and John Hannon, director of the Department of Real Estate, and got Hannon to reconsider the bid. Last month, Franczyk drafted a resolution urging the Common Council to support the sale of these lots, which was passed. But progress has once again stalled because the Council can only go so far. Approval must come from elsewhere in City Hall. “That neighborhood except for the Broadway Market, just has corner stores where you can’t get fresh food,” Franczyk says. “Let’s work with them and try to help them do it. Don’t look at the hole in the donut.”
Brian Reilly, commissioner for the Department of Economic Development, Permit and Inspection Services, says Buffalo must stick to its 2004 comprehensive development plan and must be consistent. Also, he says, the words “agriculture” and “farming” don’t exist in the city’s existing zoning code, written in the 1950s. (Mayor Byron Brown charged lawmakers with updating the city’s zoning code this year. Reilly says it hasn’t been discussed whether code could be created to encompass urban farming.)
Reilly says his first responsibility is to the billions of dollars that have been poured into Buffalo’s infrastructure over the decades. “We must reuse urban land to its highest and best use potential to get the best return on the infrastructure investments that the public sector has made over the years,” he says.
Ron Talboys, president and founder of Buffalo Habitat for Humanity, said the Wilson Street lots were in their sights to be developed in the long term, but he would be willing to cede the land so that the Stevens family could develop it. The first time he heard about the Stevens’ bid was this week and he was never consulted on the city’s interpretation of Habitat’s plans for that block. He has spoken to both Stevens and Franczyk this week and has expressed his willingness to come to the table. “We would be glad to sit down with the city to compromise,” Talboys says.
Even if Habitat is willing to release their claims on the land, Reilly says that doesn’t necessarily mean the Stevens family will be approved to buy it. The city works with other developers on land development projects, such as the Matt Urban Community Development Organization (whose Crescent Village project on nearby Sweet Street is currently on hold, thanks to the credit crunch) and NRP Group of Cleveland (which is currently working with Belmont Shelter on a plan to scatter 60 rent-to-own, suburban-style new-builds in the East Side’s Cold Springs neighborhood).
“We still have to ask ourself, ‘What’s the best use for 27 lots?’” Reilly says. “Yet again, we find ourselves having an unclear process. We want to be clear. We want certainty and predictability.”
Even just 20 years ago, the Broadway-Fillmore neighborhood had full blocks of houses. Now, the neighborhood looks like jagged teeth, with one house for every three or four empty lots. The block of Wilson Street that the Stevens’ want to develop has three houses still standing on it, one which is boarded up. The two acres of land is currently encumbered with plastic bags, empty beer bottles, and deflated basketballs. Across from the lots are the backs of the houses and unsightly garages from the homes on Fillmore, including the Stevens’ barn-like garage, which already has a hay loft in it. “Farming is my dream,” Janice says.
The Stevens family has a vision to truck in dirt and compost, make raised plant beds and grow fresh produce, but they’re not quick to spin elaborate, long-term plans for the land. They’re keeping their plans simple for now. There are already two successful urban farms on the West Side of Buffalo that have knit their respective communities together. “There’s a better voice on the West Side,” Stevens says. “We feel a little lonely over here.”
Stevens says he doesn’t necessarily consider himself an activist. He’s a gentle man with a quiet determination who is willing to ride this as far as he can. Both he and his wife were raised with the philosophy that you can learn to do anything by reading books, doing research and giving it a try. “We’re Christians,” he says. “It’s part of our faith that if you get to know people and show them love, then grassroots change can come from there…I believe activism is by your own feet, not going and demonstrating. I’m just the type that walks out and gets things done.”
Since they moved in, they have been gardening in the lot next door, owned by their next-door neighbor Bob Sienkewicz, a former employee of Franczyk’s who also has a background working in demolition and housing development. He says the Stevens family is “probably the best neighbors you could ever possibly want.” He points out that Wilson is essentially an alley street and isn’t the most desirable place to build a house anyway. The produce the Stevens family has shared with him from the small plot is “absolutely phenomenal” and “as wholesome as you’re going to get.”
The Stevens’ rejection comes on the heels of Monique Watts, co-founder of Urban Roots Community Garden Center, being forced to get rid of the five chickens she kept in her Rhode Island Street backyard. Due to a 2004 amendment to the city code, precipitated by an increase in cockfighting, fowl are not allowed in the city. But Watts wanted her hens for good reasons: In addition to the fresh eggs, Watts’ chicken ate pesky insects, and the fertilizer tey produced was great for her gardens. In the past two weeks, Watts and her husband, Blair Woods, have met with lawmakers and have convinced the Common Council to reconsider the law.
Watts says she supports the Stevens’ fight to obtain the lots for farming. She sees similarities between their struggle and hers, in that “the city’s up against things that they haven’t dealt with in the past. If we can continue to educate our City Hall people, then a process can be put into place,” she says. “There is no process to deal with all these vacant homes and lots. It comes down to the fact that things are changing and City Hall needs to keep up.”
In the past week, the Stevens family has received an outpouring of support from strangers, even an attorney who offered to help them if things came to a head. Another supporter of the Stevens’ proposed farm is Rod McCallum, owner of Queen City Farm. When he bought his East Utica home two years ago, McCallum had a vision similar to that of Mark and Janice Stevens. He moved his family in last year and bought some privately owned lots that he plans on planting this season. But there are three acres of city-owned land on his block that he has his eyes on, too. McCallum is hoping that other city initiatives, such as Groundwork Buffalo and the Common Council Community Garden Task Force, will bear some fruit. “For the community development community, the idea of urban farming makes them swoon, but City Hall needs to catch up,” McCallum says.
Other cities like Milwaukee and New York City already have urban farms in place. Detroit is trying to jump on the bandwagon too. An April 2 article in the Detroit Free Press reveals businessman John Hantz’s plans to take hundreds of vacant lots and develop them into a large commercial farm. Detroit already has hundreds of community gardens, but this would be its first large-scale farm.
Sienkewicz sees the opportunity to develop urban farming in Buffalo as the chance to create something special. “You start bringing creative and innovative ideas to a city like ours and that’s what will attract people to the city. It helps develop a place,” he says. “Sometimes City Hall doesn’t think as much in a creative manner that they could.”
Reilly says that even if the Stevens family gets another “no” from the city, they shouldn’t scratch the idea completely. He suggests a garden project near the Central Terminal, working in conjunction with the Broadway Market. “We’re always committed to working with people about new and interesting land uses,” he says. “You went through the normal channels, we screened this, the answer is no, now let’s compromise.”
The Stevens family isn’t giving up the fight yet with so many people on their side. In the meantime, they’ll continue to shop for their produce at the Lexington Co-op and Wegman’s, but they’ll keep hoping for the day when their family can go behind their house and harvest it themselves. “As long as there’s a next step,” Stevens says, “I’ll take it.”
Reader Comments
Lita 08 Apr 2009, 22:55
"The answer is no, now let's compromise." Politicospeak for "Do it our way." Just let these people have at it, for heaven's sake. After years of people being less than motivated and inspired to make changes in the community, especially the East Side, City Hall should just support creative ideas such as this. Does the East Side really need more of this kind of housing? Does any part of Buffalo? Sorry, not feeling the housing side of things. Urban farms, now that's another provocative story. I say, let them run with it.
uh... 09 Apr 2009, 12:49
how can there be two farms on the west side if there is no zoning for farms or agriculture?
dave viggiano 09 Apr 2009, 14:09
I'm a former Buffalonian who moved away years ago because I felt business opportunities were elsewhere. It breaks my heart to visit Buffalo's inner city and see beautiful but empty buildings and vacant lot for "lack of commerce." Buffalo politicians, please lead the way. Former steel- town cities need all the help they can get. My one small voice is to just simply say "support the inner city farms." Sustainability is not a bad word. Sincerely, good luck with the idea moving forward.
Stay Classy 09 Apr 2009, 17:08
It's great to see people transplant from the country to the city and believe me, I'm all for urban farming but 1. who buys a house with the thought of farming across the street but doesn't bother to find out if the lots are available and 2. I'm curious about the quality of the soil due to possible asbestos and lead contamination. Anyone know if they can actually farm safe produce on that land or any land with a history of pre-1970 housing stock and heavy manufacturing? It is an unfortunate circumstance and now the city is getting blamed because they won't let these people (who sound wonderful and I believe they probably are) do whatever they want. I know there are things that the city gets right and there are things that the city gets wrong - I have to say, I side with the city on this one.
Betty Barcode 09 Apr 2009, 19:27
Stay Classy, you must have missed this sentence: "The Stevens family has a vision to truck in dirt and compost, make raised plant beds and grow fresh produce..." Seeing as how they are *already* organic farmers, I'm sure they know more about developing safe and rich soil than almost everyone reading this story.
bufloonitick 09 Apr 2009, 21:15
just curious if anyone has asked or solicited an opinion from the immediate neighbors as to what they think about the farm. personally I think it's a great idea but it would be good to get some input from those who live around the parcel to be farmed.
Paul & Anna 11 Apr 2009, 13:02
My wife & I purchased a home from the city auction last year a few doors down from the Stevens family. We are very close personal friends w/ the Stevens family and that was one of the major reasons we purchased the home. My wife & I are both in total support of the urban farm and plan to help the Stevens if the plan is approved by the city. We are also close friends w/ their next door neighbors (another reason we moved to the area) who both support the idea and have a garden of their own. As noted in the article, their other next door neighbor (Bob Seinkewicz) also supports the urban farm plan is also currently allowing the Stevens to use his property for gardening. Counsel President Dave Franczyk also lives on the same block. Additionally, there are neighbors across the street on Fillmore that approve of the idea. In summary, there is great support from a lot of people that live w/in proximity of the Stevens.
susan 11 Apr 2009, 15:15
I feel that this is a great idea for this sad, depressed city. No one is interested in living there- why would anyone one want to??? But to use the land for a purpose- to help bring a community together-what is wrong with that??? I don't even live in the city but am in great favor of urban farm plans. I wish these people the best of luck and totally support them.The city needs to support this and help the community in a way they really haven't before. This family must know what they are doing since it has been their way of life.
Yuri Hreshchyshyn 12 Apr 2009, 12:08
The East Buffalo Good Neighbors Planning Alliance- Broadway Fillmore Neighborhood Plan identifies Wilson street as a potential linear park from Martin Luther King Park to William Street. An addendum of the Plan, accepted by the City after months of review, precisely graphs the green space along Wilson St., as well as on Paderewski. An urban farm is consistent with this plan; housing is not. Fillmore Avenue was identified by Olmsted as a parkway; due to commercial growth his plan was not implemented. Wilson St., essentially an alley behind Fillmore Avenue properties provides the alternative greenway to connect the Parade to parks south. Residents in housing on Strauss St. and west can only benefit from this amenity. This Mayor, who once supported improvements to MLK Park should know better. The administration's response is ill-advised and not consistent with its own precepts. The Good Neighbors Planning Alliance is a program of the Office of Strategic Planning structured to provide citizen input into the development of the City Strategic Plan. It has provided planners valuable local insight otherwise unavailable, enriching the City's database; allowing for better decision making. Possibly this time. -YuriHreshchyshyn
Kelly 13 Apr 2009, 16:05
Tell Mayor Brown and the Common Council what you think. Send your thoughts right to their e-mail inbox: MayorBrownWebMail@ch.ci.buffalo.ny.us ccbrdavis@city-buffalo.com, rfontana@city-buffalo.com, dfranczyk@city-buffalo.com, jgolombek@city-buffalo.com, mkearns@city-buffalo.com, mlocurto@city-buffalo.com, darivera@city-buffalo.com, brussell@city-buffalo.com, dsmith@city-buffalo.com, bbrown@city-buffalo.com, asanfilippo@city-buffalo.com
ADM-NOT 14 Apr 2009, 01:13
What has Buffalo come to, subsistance farming? Is this the revitalized inner city? The Stevens family should put their money where their mouth is. Show the city how many living wage jobs they will create on their subsistance farm. Will they pay union wages? Will they promote economic development? Nope, this is folley. Another idiotic waste of time. If the Stevens family was serious about farming, there are hundreds of acres of prime farm land for sale outside of the City, in agricultural areas of Erie and Niagara counties. Buy it, farm it, hire workers, sell your crops at market. This is a complete joke.
John Q Blogger
14 Apr 2009, 13:33
Two acres of fresh home grown food that could be produced by a family run farm is something that a neighborhood like the East Side could use. The reduction in shipping costs and use of oil products is a benefit that would produce less expensive and fresher food. There once was farming conducted in areas that are now part of our city. There are massive amounts of open land in Buffalo that remain empty, vacant lots. A small farm is a small business. The founders of our country would be 100% behind urban farming because this sort of activity makes us stronger as a nation and creates community bonds. This is not a joke. It is small American enterprise at it's best. The Stevens family are putting their lives where their mouths are. Anybody who comes into an area like Wilson Street to create a small farm is a pioneer and a brave soul. Remember this country would not have grown to the size it is today without settlers who had a dream and a will to make change in the midst of adversity. We need less corporate farming and imported food from China. Leave a Comment:
|
|
Issue Navigation> Issue Index > v8n15 (Week of Thursday, April 9, 2009) > No, Pioneers! This Week's Issue • Artvoice Daily • Artvoice TV • Events Calendar • Classifieds |







